I have received many emails regarding dedicated bearers and
mobile networks policy interface in past few months. This directly shows there
is good amount of work being put in to make Gx interface work by both operators
and telecom vendors. While Gx interface has been sitting for a while in UMTS
networks, it dint have any interaction with mobile devices. What I mean is Gx
was mainly used to enable statically configured rules, mainly DPI rules, on
GGSN and was invisible to UE, except that operators had opportunity to do all
sorts of weird stuff using user’s data. Drop, police, charge differently.. Net Neutrality?
However with LTE, Gx seems to be playing significant role by
establishing dedicated bearers. Policy Charging and Rule function is
responsible for activating rules that lead to dedicated bearer creation, send
rating group information that is used for charging, control qos etc.
Gy is cousin brother of Gx. Gy is charging interface towards
OCS that is mainly (not necessarily) used for prepaid subscribers. Both Gx and
Gy are Diameter based interfaces that run over TCP or SCTP. With 3GPP Release
8+ Gx was also given function of Gy, by enabling Usage Monitoring. This
solution is already present in most pre release 8 gateways as proprietary
solutions. So nice of 3GPP for making it a standard!
When subscriber attaches to a mobile network, GGSN sends a
message (Diameter credit control request) to PCRF. This message carries quite a
bit of information about UE. See 3GPP TS 29.212 for more details. Once this
message is received, based on the subscription, PCRF may return new Qos,
charging rules etc. Based on information, received from PCRF, PGW/GGSN may create a new
dedicated bearer or modify qos etc.
Typically in UMTS networks, PCRF sends Bearer Identifies in charging
rules, which tell GGSN to which bearer these rules should be applied. In EPS PCRF just sends the rules and PGW
decides to which bearer these rules need to be applied to. This means in UMTS
PCRF was doing bearer binding and in LTE PGW is doing bearer binding.
We all have heard of Data plans where operators throttle
user data after a certain limit. This can be nicely achieved by using the usage
monitoring functionality over Gx. When a subscriber is created PCRF allocates
some data volume with some qos. After that volume is reached PCRF may send new
volume with downgraded qos. This is very
hard to achieve, not impossible though, using Gx and Gy interfaces as Gy doesn’t
have any insight of user qos.
There are several advantages of Gx interface but that comes with
additional TCP processing on the Gateways and additional cost for PCRF deployment.
Will post more!
Just when I was going to post this, I noticed an interested
presentation in 3G4G blog by Zahid regarding PCC! Head
on
PS - I am terribly busy with work. Couldn’t post anything for
some time! I also ignored few comments/emails.
Apologies :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment